COLUMBUS — Joe Biden is leading the way when it comes to gender confusion. Not only has Biden appointed a Justice to the nation’s top court unable to define what a woman is, Biden has also constructed a Department of Education that gets a failing grade when it comes to biology.
In response, David Yost is leading the way when it comes to opposing the Biden agenda to allow boys into girls’ school locker rooms and restrooms. Yost has spearheaded an effort along with a group of state attorneys general to oppose proposed radical rulemaking by the Biden Department of Education entitled, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.”
Attorney General Dave Yost has authored a letter to the Biden Administration signed by Attorney Generals from eighteen other states. Yost raised numerous arguments in his 30-page letter to the Department of Education.
The letter stated, “The Proposed Rule (Biden’s radical Title IX mandates) will hurt women’s’ scholarships. Most universities offer women-specific scholarships, particularly in STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and math). While that practice can be controversial (if a school disadvantages men), under the Proposed Rule, a school would be unable to preserve scholarships to benefit either women or men. That may affect women’s long-term earning and career potential. Women make up only twenty-one percent of engineering majors and nineteen percent of computer science majors. If opportunities for women are reduced by the Proposed Rule, that gap will only widen. “
“If the women’s locker
Ohio Attorney General David Yost
room allows male entrants, would-be witnesses are not likely to think much of biological men entering the room. And that makes it easier for non-transgender sex
criminalsto enter areas wherewomen are vulnerable. There is a reason that humans,
for millennia, have seen fit to separate the sexes with respect to certain activities. It
is passing arrogant to assume these barriers can be torn down without consequence.”
Yost wrote, “When it comes to sexual assault, the main problem with failing to separate the sexes is that it becomes easier for non-transgender sexual predators to infiltrate women’s-only spaces where women are likely to be vulnerable. After all, if the women’s locker room allows male entrants, would-be witnesses are not likely to think much of biological men entering the room. And that makes it easier for non-transgender sex criminals to enter areas where women are vulnerable. There is a reason that humans, for millennia, have seen fit to separate the sexes with respect to certain activities. It is passing arrogant to assume these barriers can be torn down without consequence.”
Yost provided examples.
“Just last year, in Loudon County, Virginia, a “pansexual” biological male assaulted a girl in a girl’s restroom—a restroom he had access to because the school had a policy of resisting sex-based bathroom distinctions. And female athletes, like college swimmer Riley Gaines, experience “extreme discomfort” in sharing locker rooms with biological men.”
Similarly in 2016, the Obama administration informed educators in Ohio that failure to permit biological boys into girls-only facilities would result in the loss of federal funds. Now Biden and the democrats are threatening Ohio once again with the loss of funds.
In response, over one hundred clergymen from Richland County wrote a letter to local school superintendents and state officials to defy the Obama restroom mandate. They asserted the “Department of Education lacks authority to unilaterally redefine sex. They also said the radical mandate jeopardizes the privacy and safety of vulnerable and women and children, defies objectivity and logic, exploits low income and disabled students by aborting funds for school meals, eliminates funding for students with disabilities, and triggers intolerance with people of religious conviction and/or differing opinion.”
Related articles:
The Bottom Line:
The Bible says in Romans One, “For this cause GOD gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly…”
